P21S05: Urinary
incontinence (medication)
Bottom line: Information on urinary incontinence was used to modify the management of a patient (add a
medication). There were no
information-related patient health outcomes.
Level 1 outcome (situational relevance): On May 6, 2009, P21 did a search at home, by themselves, and after an
encounter with a patient. They retrieved one information hit about urinary incontinence. The reported search objectives were: to address a clinical question,
and to fulfill an educational or research objective. “She [the patient, a 60 years old woman] had urinary
incontinence, so I wanted to look it up [...] in terms of treatment, to make sure I gave
her the right treatment. [...] I had a question about that patient, [the question
was]: what is the treatment of urinary incontinence. [...] I wanted to
learn so I guess in learning you’re fulfilling an educational objective.” According to P21,
e-Therapeutics+ was the only source for information, and the found information
was relevant.
Level 2 outcome (cognitive impact): One hit was associated with a report of positive cognitive impact (see table). Regarding
practice improvement and learning, P21 stated: “[My practice will be] improved, just [by] making sure
that the treatments [I] give [to my] patients are the most recent and recommended
ones. […] Learning what’s more up-to-date in terms of
treatment and what medication is recommended for this and this condition
[vaginal estrogens] and what’s going to help the patient the most [is important
to me]. [...] I wanted her to come back and see me. I don’t think I gave her anything”
Retrieved
information hit:
1) e-Therapeutics+ (CIRT): e-Therapeutics Tab – Home – Evaluate
therapeutic information, Highlight about stress incontinence (P21S05H01)
Level 3 outcome
(information use): Information on urinary incontinence was retrieved, and used to modify the management of a patient (information
used as presented in e-Therapeutics+). “I’m gonna see
the patient again in a couple of weeks, so I’ll just basically make sure she’s
having the same symptoms and prescribe her the appropriate medication. [...] Because I
didn’t give her anything [the first encounter, before the search for
information] so it’s actually to add something [to modify her
treatment next encounter].”
Level 4 outcome (patient health): Patient health
outcomes were unknown (no follow-up yet).
Levels of outcome of information-seeking
Situational relevance |
Positive cognitive
impact |
Information use |
Patient health |
Address a clinical question Fulfill educational objective |
Practice improved Learned something |
Manage differently |
No outcome |