P18S05: Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

 

Bottom line: Information on Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder was used to maintain the management plan for a patient (start medication), and to persuade the patient to make this change. It contributed to increase patient knowledge.

 

Level 1 outcome (situational relevance): On July 7, 2008, P18 did a search at work, by themselves, and after an encounter with a patient. They retrieved one information hit about treatments for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). The reported search objectives were: to address a clinical question, to look up something they had forgotten and to share information with a patient or caregiver. He [the patient, a man of 22 years old] has been diagnosed OCD and he is trying to deal without medication. But he’s going back to University in the fall and he just needed to have something to help out a little bit more. So he heard that SSRI’s [Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor] were useful and he wanted to know which SSRI would be the better choice for him, which has little side effects. […] I wasn’t sure if they [SSRIs] all work exactly for OCD or if one works more […] or in terms of side effects what, what’s more useful what’s not. […] We [P18 and patient] discussed what some of his options were. According to P18, the information from e-Therapeutics+ was in agreement and equally relevant as the information from another electronic resource (Up-to-Date).

 

Level 2 outcome (cognitive impact): One hit was associated with a report of positive cognitive impact (see table). Regarding learning, P18 stated: I probably just brushed up on the side effects in terms of comparing one to another. [I learned] that Cipralex is not used for OCD.

Retrieved information hit:

1) e-Therapeutics+ (CIRT): Therapeutics Tab – Keyword: Obsessive Compulsive Disorders – Anxiety disorders Table 3 Drugs used for the management of Anxiety Disorders – Check all drugs under SSRI’s and SNRI’s–Compare drugs (P18S05H01)

 

Level 3 outcome (information use): Information on treatments for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder was retrieved, and used to better understand a specific issue with respect to the management of the patient, to maintain (be more certain about) the management plan for a patient (start medication), and to persuade the patient to make this change (information presented in e-Therapeutics+ was modified). “I added more information [about] what are the options for OCD […] [I had] to persuade or I’d say educate [him, the patient] because he was concerned about all the side effects he thought he would have from these meds. […][I told him that] based on the percentage of people who experienced certain side effects […], for him, the benefits would probably lean more towards taking the medication.

 

Level 4 outcome (patient health): Regarding patient health, P18 reported that the information contributed to increase patient knowledge. “He [the patient] came looking for information about medication for OCDs. […] He didn’t know anybody that has OCD or he didn’t know of other people who took those medications [SSRI] so I guess it becomes […] more acceptable if you hear that some people do take it and they have no side effects.

 

 

Levels of outcome of information-seeking

 

Situational relevance

Positive cognitive impact

Information use

Patient health

Address a clinical question

Look up something forgotten

Share information

Learned something

Reminded something

Confirmed

Reassured

Persuade

Be more certain

Understand issue

Patient knowledge

 

 

Home