P16S06: Joint pain

 

Bottom line: Information on joint pain was used to maintain the management of a patient (stop treatment as planned). It contributed to increase patient knowledge.

 

Level 1 outcome (situational relevance): On March 2, 2009, P16 did a search at work, by themselves, during the encounter with the patient (in the presence of the patient). They retrieved one information hit about Joint pain and Ciprofloxacin. The reported search objectives were: to address a clinical question, and to share information with a patient. “She [the patient, a woman in her sixties] had been started on the medication [Ciprofloxacin], and she had experienced some pain, some joint pain. She was wondering if it could be related to the medication. […]I was seeing her for another reason and she brought [this question] up to me.” According to P16, e-Therapeutics+ was the only source for information, and the found information was relevant.

 

Level 2 outcome (cognitive impact): One hit was associated with a report of positive cognitive impact (see table). Regarding practice improvement and learning, P16 stated: “[The found information will help me] to further understand that particular side effect for future counselling with patients. […] I learned […] more than I had known before [on Ciprofloxacin].”

Retrieved information hit:

1) e-Therapeutics+ (CIRT): e-CPS Tab – Keyword: Cipro – Adverse reactions – Musculoskeletal (P16S06H01)

 

Level 3 outcome (information use): Information on Joint pain and Ciprofloxacin was retrieved, and used to better understand a specific issue with respect to the management of the patient, and to maintain (be more certain about) the management of a patient (information used as presented in e-Therapeutics+). “The patient was just at the end of their treatment course when they experienced the reaction, so we discussed making sure that their family physician, the person who prescribed it, was aware of the potential side effects so that they knew about that in the future and that if her pain persisted, that she would go back to her family doctor. […] I have seen her [the patient] since then and the pain resolved. […][But because] she was stopping the drug [anyway], we weren’t proposing sort of any changes to it [to the end of the treatment].”

 

Level 4 outcome (patient health): Regarding patient health, P16 reported that the information contributed to increase patient knowledge. “She [the patient] was [now] aware that there was a potential side effect from the medication.”

 

 

Levels of outcome of information-seeking

 

Situational relevance

Positive cognitive impact

Information use

Patient health

Address a clinical question

Share information

Practice improved

Learned something

Reminded something

Confirmed

Reassured

Be more certain

Understand issue

Patient knowledge

 

 

Home