P08S07: Intermittent claudication (same medication)

 

Bottom line: Information on intermittent claudication was used to maintain the management of the patient (continue medication with optimized dose). It contributed to increase patient knowledge about the treatment.

 

Level 1 outcome (situational relevance): On June 13, 2008, P08 did a search at work, by themselves, and after an encounter with a patient. They retrieved one information hit about intermittent claudication. The reported search objectives were: to search in general or for curiosity, and to share information with a patient. “[The patient was] a female and she would be early sixties. […] Se had claudication symptoms. And she tested positive on our AB index for peripheral arterial disease. […] I kind of knew in my mind what the overall treatment would be for peripheral arterial disease but I just wanted to read it just to make sure I wasn’t missing anything. [...] [I wanted] to go through it with her as well.” According to P08, e-Therapeutics+ was the only source for information, and the found information was relevant.

 

Level 2 outcome (cognitive impact): One hit was associated with a report of positive cognitive impact (see table). Regarding practice improvement, P08 stated: “I was just reminded of the other benefits of ACE inhibitors, not just for blood pressure, the other benefits as well. [...] [I will be] more consistent in terms of therapeutic approach for future patients.”

Retrieved information hit(s):

1) e-Therapeutics+ (CIRT): Therapeutics tab – claudication - intermittent claudication - Highlight (P08S07H01)

 

Level 3 outcome (information use): Information on intermittent claudication was retrieved, and used to maintain (be more certain about) the management of the patient (information used as presented in e-Therapeutics+). “I think she was already on an ACE inhibitor. I optimized the dose

 

Level 4 outcome (patient health): Regarding patient health, P08 reported that the information contributed to increase patient knowledge. “With the client-centered care, you know, being sure that the patient understands the benefit of the medication.”

 

 

Levels of outcome of information-seeking

 

Situational relevance

Positive cognitive impact

Information use

Patient health

Satisfy curiosity

Share information

Practice improved

Reminded something

Motivated to learn

Be more certain

Patient knowledge

 

Home