P06S02: Urinary tract infection (first-line treatment)

 

Bottom line: Information on urinary tract infection was used to maintain the management of a patient (3-day first-line antibiotherapy). There were no information-related patient health outcomes.

 

Level 1 outcome (situational relevance): On June 10, 2008, P06 did a search at work, with a patient (during the encounter). They retrieved three information hits about urinary tract infection. The reported search objective was to address a clinical question. “[The patient was] a 24 year-old woman. […] She was having dysuria. She had stomach ache and I was not sure if it was a urinary infection or a vaginal infection. I did some urine tests and it came back with leucocytes and nitrites and proteins. So I told myself “ok, this is a urinary infection.” And I wanted to treat her.  […] [My clinical question was about the] first line treatment.” According to P06, the information from e-Therapeutics+ was in agreement with and equally relevant to the information from another paper-based resource (Guidelines handbook). “I compared with my ‘Anti-infective guidelines’. […] The two sources gave me exactly the same information.

 

Level 2 outcome (cognitive impact): Three hits were associated with a report of positive cognitive impact (see table). Regarding confirmation and reassurance, P06 stated:[The information confirmed and I was reassured that] I was doing the right thing, that my first line choices, that they were good choices and that, once again, I am not way off track (regarding all hits).

Retrieved information hit(s):

1) e-Therapeutics+ (CIRT): Therapeutics tab – urinary tract infection – Highlight (P06S02H01).

2) e-Therapeutics+ (CIRT): Therapeutics tab – urinary tract infection – Table 2: Clinical syndromes of UTI, infecting organisms, and criteria for microbiologic diagnosis (P06S02H02).

3) e-Therapeutics+ (CIRT): Therapeutics tab – urinary tract infection – Table 3: Antimicrobials for the treatment of urinary tract infection (P06S02H03).

 

Level 3 outcome (information use): Information on urinary tract infection was retrieved, and used to maintain (be more certain about) the management of the patient (information used as presented in e-Therapeutics+). “I gave Sulfamethoxazole–Trimethoprim […] twice a day for three days, which is exactly what was recommended here [in e-Therapeutics+] (regarding all hits).

 

Level 4 outcome (patient health): Without this information, P06’s management of the patient would have been the same. There were no clear relationships between the use of information and expected patient health outcomes.

 

 

Levels of outcome of information-seeking

 

Situational relevance

Positive cognitive impact

Information use

Patient health

Address a clinical question

Confirmed

Reassured

Be more certain

No outcome

 

Home