P03S07: Urinary tract infection (diagnostic test)

 

Bottom line: Information on urinary tract infection was used to maintain the management of the patient (testing). There were no information-related patient health outcomes.

 

Level 1 outcome (situational relevance): On December 10, 2008, P03 did a search at work, by themselves, and after an encounter with a patient. They retrieved one information hit about treatment following a MSU [midstream specimen of urine]. The reported search objective was to address a clinical question. “I saw the patient in the clinic [a woman in her late fifties]. We did a urine test. […] We got the MSU, the urine test said she was growing a certain bacteria in her urine. So, I was looking to see which drugs acted on this specific microorganism. […] I had an idea of what I was going to do, but I wanted to confirm.” According to P03, e-Therapeutics+ was the only source for information, and the found information was relevant.

 

Level 2 outcome (cognitive impact): One hit was associated with a report of positive cognitive impact (see table). Regarding practice improvement, P03 stated: “I now have the information as I actually printed off one of the tables […] to take with me for my other patients. It’s not something I have to memorize but I take with me. […] It helped me to understand which drug is best to prescribe for certain microorganisms. [This] actual table I was familiar with, and knew how to prescribe the drugs and the adverse effects.”

Retrieved information hit(s):

1) e-Therapeutics+ (CIRT): Therapeutic tab - infectious diseases - urinary tract infection chapter (P03S07H01).

 

Level 3 outcome (information use): Information on treatment following a MSU was retrieved, and used to better understand a specific issue with respect to the management of the patient, and to maintain (be more certain about) the management of the patient (information used as presented in e-Therapeutics+). “I contacted the patient to let her know the results and what I was going to be prescribing for her and to find out the pharmacy information and then called the prescription in for the patient..”

 

Level 4 outcome (patient health): Without this information, P03’s management of the patient would have been the same. There were no clear relationships between the use of information and expected patient health outcomes.

 

 

Levels of outcome of information-seeking

 

Situational relevance

Positive cognitive impact

Information use

Patient health

Address a clinical question

Practice improved

Learned something

Motivated to learn

Be more certain

Understand issue

No outcome

 

Home